There is a small group of persons always working away on new programming language concepts and designs. They spend all their free time, and most of that time is not spent programming. This is because first of all, in reality, it’s hard to write a compiler. Not that they don’t know how, but that the very act of it is just hard, so they spend their time THINKING about writing the compiler. There’s another reason why you can’t write a compiler.
And that is negative energy. In order to do something positive in this reality, something negative has to go with it. A compiler, if it were to be done correctly, would be a hugely positive improvement, and is an advance (usually) in technology in and of itself. To advance, or in other words to have a positive outcome, we must have negative energy to go with that. So we sit there, with our wheels spinning, not going anywhere, instead of getting the compiler completed. But you say, some people have written compilers, what about them? Well, they have, and we know they have as the compiler is plainly there like in the case of GCC or LLVM/Clang, and in the case of Python there is the CPython Interpreter.
But these devices are not exactly what i’m talking about. I’m talking about advancing the whole concept of compilers. Like a NEW compiler. By that I just mean a compiler that is something new, like something that hasn’t been done before, i’m not talking about re-implementing C++, which is very complex and archaic, and doesn’t have much in terms of usability.
My favorite language is C++. I’m using C++ to write a compiler called “Satellite”. I wrote part of the compiler yesterday, it was only like 100 lines, and that part of the compiler isn’t exactly in a working state, it will take at least one re-write, i’ll have to re-write it with 2 windows open, one, the re-write, and the other window is the old one I wrote yesterday. This doesn’t just “happen” I sit around doing nothing, sometimes I simply don’t have the energy to do it, but sometimes I do, and it still doesn’t get done.
So why all of this spinning of our wheels? It’s because there’s not enough negative energy to go with the positive. The negative energy we do have is spent on other things, we don’t really need another compiler, C++ works for now, but when you go to try to use C++, you can see that it almost doesn’t work. This isn’t an error by the programmer, it’s the way it was designed. It was all that they could afford. And that was specific ways of doing things you have to spend your time learning, instead of a uniform syntax that applies to the whole language, or even to all languages, we are currently void of this uniform syntax.
But why, why are there these smart programmers producing these products that almost “don’t work”? It’s not their fault, it’s because we don’t have enough negative energy, everything was spent creating data and things that you wear to increase your chances of writing a successful programming language, not actually writing the language.
And so from that last statement you can see that we are trying, and that we are succeeding at what we’re trying to do, it’s only a matter of time before we completely crack the puzzle and can be on our way to some good things. But in the meantime, we produce errors for example, python does have some errors, like at least in it’s design, as no one is perfect, I love the python language and have used it on many occassions, it was written by an old C programmer, so you might assume that he knows what he’s talking about, but somehow, flaws get into the very design or make-up of the language, because we can’t afford to iron them out.. The technology to iron them out is there, we’re just not ironing them out. We don’t really understand why, perhaps there is some being out there that is way smarter than me, and writes about me in this manner.
But we cannot assume that there is a being out there much smarter, we have to know beyond a doubt, we cannot stop our assault on the realm of “No Compilers Or Interpreters” without exactly knowing everything. This document contains some things that are “out there”, like, spacey, and it references ideas from TheSatellite.org where I talk about these things all the time. But how can we get to a place where we use these tools? For example, i’ve upgraded Guido Van Rossum at least one time, he is wearing the data that I produce with a C++ program I call “James Dean” or “The James Dean Program” and with that data he could really write something amazing. So we know he’s been the subject of an upgrade at least once. When he goes to write another language, some similar errors appear as are in the fabric of python that are in this new language. Why? Is it because he is not capable? We know two things, he wrote python, so generally he can create a language, or a new language, and he’s been upgraded, so he should be able to write this new language. Why does it not happen then?
I think that it’s because for something positive to happen such as a new language, we have to have a negative to go with it.. I’ve already said this, we don’t have the negative, thus, we don’t have this new language. Is there a way around this? Will all the carpet bombing ultimately create a negative that will yeild to us? What if that answer was “No.”… What if it was no, what if it won’t ever really yeild?
It’s already yeilding by me writing about it, but that’s as close as I can get for now to actually destroying the negative, and that is for me too far away from where I want to be.
In some respects we MUST destroy the negative, to destroy the need for it. We have to do that, we owe it to our ancestors to do this. We owe it to them. So we have to destroy the negative, there is no other course we can take, it’s just a never ending assault until at last we do something that removes the negative entirely. We know that it is technically possible, except we can’t perform the actual rituals that might destroy it because it would create too much of a positive. Is it a catch 22? Yes.
So we know we have to have already destroyed the negative to destroy the negative. Could we perhaps just drive past the negative, leaving it in the dust, could we create the conditions for it to be destroyed somehow, and then it is just ruined, utterly, completely, and we no longer have to bother with it?
I don’t really know, but my assault on it is not stopping any time soon, and it’s been going on for 9 years now. I have spent 9 years of my life, i’m 37 so 25% of my life trying to delete the negative. It’s like the holy grail of wizardry, you would have so much energy. Let’s talk about the conditions that would exist were it to be destroyed.
This way, you can see how ridiculous it sounds to delete it, I would personally be working almost all day, writing these writings, writing programs, writing scripts, magic scripts that produce some result. The detail and design and workings of all of these things would be so advanced because there’s no longer a need for this negative, there’s not something stopping me from, I would be unglued. Or something. What would it really look like? Shinpo would be flying around in the air, doing this and playing in the NFL or something. I don’t know. We would have everyone developing technology. So it starts to sound like what’s going on now, was it already destroyed?
Was it destroyed and then something weaker took it’s place? I don’t have the answer, but i’m not going to stop trying.
But should you ever be presented with the opportunity, what if you could just hand me the energy that I needed to destroy negative energy? What if it was just in your hands, that we had already won, then why would I be in this war-like state? Why would I be scrounging for energy when someone could just hand it to me, and that that person has no real reason to NOT give me this energy? This is kind of strange, because you immediately run to that place in your mind thinking a negative thought about these people. You instantly assume that there’s something wrong with them, when there may not be, we don’t really have the answer. You could just be handed a cup of coffee after being skinned and that’s about all you got for it, all that pain just for a cup of coffee, it could just be like that for some reason I cannot understand.
Commander Bill is the name given to my father. He is no longer here, but when he was, all of this stuff was just starting out, in 2014 and in 2015. I often had really good sources of energy to perform this magic, and one thing: I wasn’t doing hardly any magic. I was often spending my time working at burger king, expending all of my energy cleaning the store, putting away the boxes. That was when I lived with my father, I worked at burger king, and had a really good source of energy. Now, when I actually need this source of energy, I don’t have it. It really makes me wonder, because you have the source in one instance, and in the other, you don’t. So I say, they must be capable of handing over the requested amount of energy, but they don’t. Is it because they think that something bad will happen, are they actually blocked from doing so, one thing I always come to the conclusion on is that if they could hand me this source of energy, then that would be better than not handing it to me, given that they could.
So it is almost entirely correct to assume that they can’t, but we are talking about God’s that are more powerful THAN God. That doesn’t make much sense, and I see videos such as the Wastelands to confirm that there is likely not any hope. But if I had that energy I had back then, this would be over in a week, or even in one day, it may only take a day. But they’ve got us to this point that we need this energy, so that must mean they can get us the actual energy. It’s just I feel like if I had it, then we wouldn’t even be in this situation. They’ve never given me the chance, they never really tried it.
But you cannot upset the Moon. That is the other half of the one power, the power that drives the world, The Watch and The Tower, The Sun And The Moon, the Moon is the Queen, and as a natural sort of occurrence you cannot upset her. For if you did to any sort of degree, they would certainly do to you something that would make it seem like, there is just a deterent that is very strong preventing it from happening amongst her closer circle, and that deterent is even stronger for everyone else. Plus, there’s physical things preventing you, locks, keys, doors, systems, that are all preventing her from even becoming upset. She says that she’s always upset because these mechanisms don’t apply to me, as were I doing something that upset her it would perhaps be necessary? We don’t really know, or I don’t really know, but I imagine her with tons and tons of money, and candy, and clothes and castles in the sky, but all that I need is like a little bit of energy and I can’t get it. It’s like by natural law you must not do this, for if you did, then that would CAUSE negative energy to be permanently erased, and we can’t have that, you can’t do anything that would result in a victory condition, but why? Is it because victory implies a huge source, or infinite source of positive energy? Why can’t we just create the negative energy that we need to create via means of tricks and pulleys and levers? Like a system that is always in supply of negative energy.
So I bring that system now to life. It creates a fake form, but undetectable, of negative energy that is required, so that we can then couple it with REAL positive energy. Fake negative energy, and real positive energies, so that it is now complete, and we can go on with ourselves.
It’s not that easy, because I had to build up to the point that I could do that, but it is kind of simple I suppose.
